When to investigate an answer
An inaccurate service description, a wrong address or a similarly named organisation can justify a focused review. The starting point is the observed answer and its question. The audit records the Luxembourg scenarios covered and the limits of that sample.
Trading names and registered identities are checked separately. Luxembourg’s Trade and Companies Register provides an identity reference; registration alone does not establish which services a business offers.
Compare outputs with verifiable information
We agree on questions tied to your offers, in English and French as required. Each observation retains the assistant, collection date and context the method actually supports.
Displayed names, activities and locations are compared with information your team can substantiate. Cited sources are checked to see whether they describe the same entity and current offer. A reference may concern an earlier activity or another organisation. The sources visible in an answer are not a guaranteed inventory of the model’s underlying information.
Receive findings tied to decisions
The deliverable records each observed discrepancy and the supporting evidence. Proposed actions distinguish updates to your own site from requests to external publishers and matters outside your control.
For each correction, the report identifies what needs clarifying and where the information appears. A change to your website does not guarantee that an assistant will cite it or revise an answer. Those outcomes remain observations to verify later.
Prepare the reference material
Share official URLs, current offers and known name variants, along with any problematic responses you have retained. Internal documents can help establish the facts before a public correction is proposed.
If you then need to observe whether an error persists, AI visibility tracking for Luxembourg defines comparable collections and an agreed frequency.