When an audit should come first
You may have lost enquiries after a migration or noticed that useful pages no longer appear in search. Bring the approximate date and the URLs involved. A national service page and a page describing an establishment may have different roles, so they should not automatically share the same diagnosis.
The aim is to establish the problem you can act on and the evidence needed to choose a correction.
What we examine
We compare the affected pages and queries with the relevant period and site changes. The France country filter is one part of that analysis; it describes the origin of the search. Customer location requires separate information. English and French page groups are examined separately where useful.
For indexing questions, we inspect access and the version Google has recorded. Google’s URL Inspection documentation distinguishes the indexed version from a live test. A successful live request cannot establish that Google has selected the expected page.
What you receive
Each finding identifies the page or group involved and the evidence supporting the proposed explanation. Where uncertainty remains, the report names the additional check needed to assess the possible cause.
Corrections are implemented with the agreed access or supplied as tickets for your team. Verification records the deployed change and whether Google has revisited it. If the issue is already established, technical SEO for France may be the appropriate starting service.
Scope of the engagement
The proposal defines the problem, the access required and the review of the findings. Read-only Search Console access supports diagnosis; code or CMS permissions are agreed separately. Delivery is available in English and French, without a promise of traffic recovery.
Describe the change you observed, or review the general SEO audit service.